Clinical trial of a birth and parenting planning program for women diagnosed with fetal anomalies: A feasibility study.

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of the Birth and Parenting Planning (BPPing) program we developed to support women diagnosed with fetal anomalies. We conducted a feasibility study using a quasi-experimental, post-test only, non-equivalent groups design. We assessed feasibility from four aspects: (1) Demand: birth plan submitting rate (primary outcome); (2) Acceptability: woman's satisfaction of care scale (SATISFACTION) and Visual Analog Scale for care satisfaction; (3) Preliminary efficacy: women's recognition of being able to express and share her hopes scale (HOPES); and (4) Safety: obstetric/neonatal outcomes and frequency of women's referral to a psychological counselor. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for data analysis. We enrolled 62 women with fetal anomalies attending a perinatal medical center for antenatal check-ups. Of these, 51 women (median age: 34 years) received either the BPPing program (intervention group: n=25) or the usual care (control group: n=26). The birth plan submitting rates were 96% (intervention group, 24/25) and 7.7% (control group, 2/26). The intervention group had a significantly higher total score on HOPES at postpartum (U=441.5, p=0.027). Upon subgroup analysis based on parity, in the intervention group only, the multiparas had a higher score on the SATISFACTION item, "I would recommend the care I received to someone in a similar situation". There were no adverse events in either group. The BPPing program was feasible in supporting women diagnosed with fetal anomalies in terms of demand, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and safety.