Abstract

Since the 1950s, sentinel surveillance networks with general practitioners (GPs) have been progressively implemented and involved in influenza surveillance, e.g. in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Portugal and Spain. Since 1988, several collaborative European studies with sentinel networks aimed at stimulating influenza surveillance all over Europe and harmonising the surveillance activities [1-3]. In Belgium, a sentinel network specifically dedicated to influenza surveillance, with the participation of about 40 GPs, was initiated in 1985 [4,5] and has participated in various European influenza related projects. Since autumn 2007, this network is integrated into the network of the Sentinel General Practitioners (SGPs) existing since 1979 and responsible for the surveillance of many other health problems [6-8]. Since then, the SGPs have been continuously involved in the clinical and virological influenza surveillance [9]. As the SGPs network is not appropriate for the detection of sporadic cases, during the containment phase of the A(H1N1)2009 (from week 14 till week 28), a comprehensive surveillance of all suspected cases of A(H1N1)2009 virus among travellers returning from the USA, Mexico or other countries at risk, was carried out by all Belgian physicians. As of week 29, the start of the mitigation phase, the SGPs were the most important tool for the clinical as well as the virological influenza surveillance. The latter was reinforced with the purpose of following up the A(H1N1)2009 virus circulation in the general population [10]. The main purposes of this influenza surveillance are the early detection of an influenza epi-demic, the study of the intensity and duration of the epidemic and the identification of the circulating viruses. The virological surveillance component is outlined elsewhere in this issue [10]. This article details the clinical surveillance activities of the SGPs from week 14, at the appearance of the A(H1N1)2009 virus, until week 53 of 2009.

Highlights

  • Since the 1950s, sentinel surveillance networks with general practitioners (GPs) have been progressively implemented and involved in influenza surveillance, e.g. in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Portugal and Spain

  • The weekly incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) patients seen in general practice per 100,000 inhabitants exceeded the baseline threshold for the first time in week 40 with an incidence of 173/100,000 inhabitants

  • The network of Sentinel General Practitioners (SGPs) has proven to be an important source of information in the influenza surveillance of the A(H1N1)2009

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the 1950s, sentinel surveillance networks with general practitioners (GPs) have been progressively implemented and involved in influenza surveillance, e.g. in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Portugal and Spain. In Belgium, a sentinel network dedicated to influenza surveillance, with the participation of about 40 GPs, was initiated in 1985 [4;5] and has participated in various European influenza related projects. The SGPs have been continuously involved in the clinical and virological influenza surveillance [9]. As of week 29, the start of the mitigation phase, the SGPs were the most important tool for the clinical as well as the virological influenza surveillance. The latter was reinforced with the purpose of following up the A(H1N1)2009 virus circulation in the general population [10]. This article details the clinical surveillance activities of the SGPs from week 14, at the appearance of the A(H1N1)2009 virus, until week 53 of 2009

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.