Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the different peripheral, neurological, genetic, and systemic etiologies of bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) and the value of vHIT in the diagnostic process.Materials and methods: A retrospective case review was performed on 176 patients diagnosed with BVP in a tertiary referral center, between 2010 and 2020. Inclusion criteria comprised imbalance and/or oscillopsia during locomotion and horizontal angular VOR gain on both sides <0.8. We classified patients into different groups according to (1) their fulfillment of the Barany guideline for bilateral vestibulopathy (2) the definite etiology of BVP and (3) the four clinical subtypes distributed in our population (recurrent vertigo with BVP, rapidly progressive BVP, slowly progressive BVP, and slowly progressive BVP with ataxia). Medical history of vertigo, hypoacusis or migraine, and family background of imbalance and/or oscillopsia were assessed. Horizontal, posterior, and superior semicircular canal angular VOR gain was registered along with saccadic parameters such as velocity, and dispersion of the saccades' latency values.Results: Barany's Society diagnostic criteria for BVP was accomplished in 89 patients. Among our patients, 13.6% had migraines in their medical history and the idiopathic group accounted for 50% of the population. All four clinical subtypes were found in our population, slowly progressive bilateral vestibulopathy without vertigo was the most frequent one. A percentage of our population could not be categorized into any of the former subtypes, many of these patients were diagnosed with BVP after suffering a single vertigo episode. Lower vHIT gains were found in those patients with Barany's criteria for BVP and oscillopsia was significantly more prevalent in this group.Conclusions: Bilateral vestibulopathy manifests with very different patterns representing a very heterogeneous condition. The distribution of the clinical subtypes and Barany's criteria are a useful clinical tool to differentiate groups of patients. The vHIT can serve as an initial tool for identifying patients with BVP. The finding of bilateral vestibular involvement in a clinically suspected unilateral vestibulopathy should be considered in some patients.

Highlights

  • MATERIALS AND METHODSBilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) is a heterogeneous clinical condition characterized by a hypofunction of the vestibular nerves or labyrinths on both sides [1]

  • We aim to review our series of BVP patients, analyze their etiologies, identify and characterize the clinical subtypes, and correlate with audio-vestibular function and familiar aggregation

  • No correlation was found between the pure-tone averages (PTAs) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) is a heterogeneous clinical condition characterized by a hypofunction of the vestibular nerves or labyrinths on both sides [1]. Reduced or absent function of the vestibular organs and/or vestibular nerves results in different levels of impairment or total loss of the major vestibular functions: posture and balance control, gaze stabilization, and spatial orientation [2]. Oscillopsia, diminished dynamic visual acuity (DVA), and balance problems are the main deficits reported by patients with BVP, in darkness and on uneven ground. BVP is a disorder with different clinical pictures (combined or isolated deficits of the otolith and semicircular canal functions), it remains a diagnostic challenge, and its often under or misdiagnosed. The most frequent etiologies of BVP include ototoxicity, Meniere’s disease, infectious diseases, and genetic disorders [3]. Its estimated prevalence in adults is 28/100,000, and it accounts for 4–7% of dizziness/vertigo [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call