Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical findings, laboratory data, functional outcome and chronic damage in male patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We studied 29 male patients with PAPS and 44 with SLE. Clinical findings, laboratory data, lupus damage index (SLICC/ACR DI), and functional outcome in PAPS, were analysed in each group. The mean age at diagnosis was 29.8 +/- 10.4 years in patients with PAPS and 26 +/- 10.1 years in SLE patients. The duration of disease was 4.5 +/- 2.6 versus 5.2 +/- 3.8 years in patients with PAPS and SLE, respectively (P = NS). In patients with PAPS the most frequent clinical manifestations were venous thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and pulmonary thromboembolism. Patients with SLE had joint, skin and renal involvement more frequently than those with PAPS (P = 0.0001). All PAPS patients had anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and 14 patients (48%) had lupus anticoagulant (LA). All SLE patients had antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were positive in 39% of SLE patients. Five patients died: one with 'catastrophic' APS and four with SLE. SLICC/ACR-DI score in SLE patients was 1.9 (SD = 1). In PAPS patients poor functional outcome was due to myocardial infarction, pulmonary thromboembolism, stroke and mesenteric thrombosis. Lupus nephritis was the principal organ damage in SLE. In conclusion, in male patients with PAPS and SLE, the clinical manifestations were significantly different. Arterial thrombosis was the major cause of functional impairment and permanent organ damage in PAPS. Renal involvement was the major cause of chronic damage in SLE.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.