Abstract

ABSTRACTThe importance of the detection of relevant toxins or toxin genes to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) or the prediction of clinical outcomes of CDI has been emphasized in recent years. Although stool culture of C. difficile is not routinely recommended in the era of nonculture methods as the preferred tools for CDI diagnosis, the clinical significance of toxigenic C. difficile growth (tCdG) in stool cultures was analyzed. A clinical study was conducted in medical wards of Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, in southern Taiwan. Diarrheal adults with fecal glutamate dehydrogenase and C. difficile toxin between January 2013 and April 2020 were included. Of the 209 patients with CDI, 158 (75.6%) had tCdG found in stool cultures, and the rest (51, 24.4%) had no tCdG in stool. Only prior ceftazidime or ceftriaxone therapy was independently associated with no tCdG in stool (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, P = 0.02). Compared to the patients with tCDG in stool, those without tCdG in stool experienced treatment success more often (97.1% versus 67.0%, P < 0.001) if treated with metronidazole or vancomycin but had a similar in-hospital mortality or recurrence rate. In the multivariate analysis among 114 patients with CDI treated with metronidazole or vancomycin, treatment success was independently associated with no tCdG in stool (OR 12.7, P = 0.02). Despite the limited utility of stool cultures in CDI diagnoses, no tCdG in stool culture heralds a favorable therapeutic outcome among adults with CDI treated with metronidazole or vancomycin.IMPORTANCE The importance of detecting toxins or toxin genes when diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) or predicting the severity and outcomes of CDI has been emphasized in recent years. Although the yielding of C. difficile from stool cultures might implicate higher bacterial loads in fecal samples, in an era of nonculture methods for the standard diagnosis of CDIs, clinical significance of positive stool cultures of toxigenic C. difficile was analyzed in this study. Despite the limited ability of stool cultures in CDI diagnoses, no yielding of C. difficile growth might predict the successful CDI therapy.

Highlights

  • The importance of the detection of relevant toxins or toxin genes to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) or the prediction of clinical outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) has been emphasized in recent years

  • In the study period, 252 patients were clinically diagnosed with CDI, but only 209 patients with unexplained diarrhea met the inclusion criterion of the presence of both glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxin A/B detected by enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) in stool and were included for further analyses (Fig. 1)

  • No toxigenic C. difficile growth in stool cultures was associated with treatment success for hospitalized adults with CDI in our study if metronidazole or vancomycin was prescribed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of the detection of relevant toxins or toxin genes to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) or the prediction of clinical outcomes of CDI has been emphasized in recent years. In the multivariate analysis among 114 patients with CDI treated with metronidazole or vancomycin, treatment success was independently associated with no tCdG in stool (OR 12.7, P = 0.02). IMPORTANCE The importance of detecting toxins or toxin genes when diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) or predicting the severity and outcomes of CDI has been emphasized in recent years. Either metronidazole or vancomycin therapy has been associated with considerable treatment failure and recurrence rates [12] Some probiotics, such as Clostridium butyricum, revealed C. difficile-inhibiting ability, there was insufficient evidence to suggest the routine use of probiotics for the prevention or treatment of CDI [13, 14]. Stool culture is currently suggested for epidemiological studies or to detect pathogens of antibiotic-associated diarrhea other than C. difficile [20, 21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call