Clinical Significance of Strong Ion Gap: between ICU and Hemodialysis Patients with Metabolic Acidosis

Abstract

Metabolic acidosis is the most frequent acid-base disorder in critically ill patients and dialysis patients. This study is to compare the conventional approach with the physicochemical approach between the intensive care unit (ICU) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. Fifty-seven ICU patients and 33 HD patients were enrolled. All data sets included simultaneous measurements of arterial blood gas with base deficit (BD), serum electrolytes, albumin, lactate, and calculated anion gap observed (AGobs). Physiochemical analysis was used to calculate the albumin and lactate-corrected anion gap (AGcorr), the base deficit corrected for unmeasured anions (BDua), the strong ion difference apparent (SIDa), the strong ion difference effective (SIDe), and the strong ion gap (SIG). The SIDa (37.5±5.3 vs 33.9±9.0, p=0.045) and SIG (12.3±5.3 vs 8.6±8.8, p=0.043) was significantly higher in the HD group than the ICU group. SIG in the ICU group showed the highest correlation coefficient with AGobs, whereas SIG in the HD group with AGcorr. Concerning the contributions of the three main causes of metabolic acidosis, increased SIG was comparable between the ICU and HD group (n=48, 90.6% vs n=30, 93.8%), whereas hyperlactatemia (n=9, 17.0% vs n=0, 0%) and hyperchloremia (n=20, 35.1% vs n=2, 6.1%) was significantly increased in the ICU group compared with the HD group. Multiple underlying mechanisms are present in most of the ICU patients with metabolic acidosis compared with the HD patients. In conclusion, the physicochemical approach can elucidate the detailed mechanisms of metabolic acidosis in ICU and HD patients compared with conventional measures.