Abstract

The Omagh bombing in August 1998 produced many of the problems documented in other major incidents. An initial imbalance between the demand and supply of clinical resources at the local hospital, poor information due to telecommunication problems, the need to triage victims and the need to transport the most severely injured significant distances were the most serious issues. The Royal Group Hospitals Trust (RGHT) received 30 severely injured secondary transfers over a 5-hour period, which stressed the hospital's systems even with the presence of extra staff that arrived voluntarily before the hospital's major incident plan was activated. Many patients were transferred to the RGHT by helicopter, but much of the time the gained advantage was lost due to lack of a helipad within the RGHT site. Identifying patients and tracking them through the hospital system was problematic. While the major incident plan ensured that communication with the relatives and the media was effective and timely, communication between the key clinical and managerial staff was hampered by the need to be mobile and by the limitations of the internal telephone system. The use of mobile anaesthetic teams helped maintain the flow of patients between the Emergency Department and radiology, operating theatres or the intensive care unit (ICU). The mobile anaesthetic teams were also responsible for efficient and timely resupply of the Emergency Department, which worked well. In the days that followed many victims required further surgical procedures. Coordination of the multidisciplinary teams required for many of these procedures was difficult. Although only seven patients required admission to adult general intensive care, no ICU beds were available for other admissions over the following 5 days. A total of 165 days of adult ICU treatment were required for the victims of the bombing.

Highlights

  • The circumstances of all major incidents are different, they show many similarities in the problems they pose to those responding and in the factors limiting the effectiveness of the response [1]

  • While many institutions/government agencies have drawn up major incident plans (MIPs), these are often missing vital elements such as education/training and a coordinated approach to communication [6,10]

  • MIPs assume an epicentre for a major event, with problems reducing with increasing distance from that point — a ‘ground zero’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The circumstances of all major incidents are different, they show many similarities in the problems they pose to those responding and in the factors limiting the effectiveness of the response [1]. To TCH) was directly damaged in the blast, and because all mobile phone networks quickly became overloaded due to heavy use by the public and arriving media personnel This meant that the primary hospital (TCH) had no direct means of communicating with its off-duty staff, with other hospitals receiving victims evacuated from the scene or with the RGHT in Belfast, which supplies the majority of tertiary referral services for the region. We should consider the use of television and radio in a more specific and deliberate way; for example, mobilizing off-duty hospital staff during a major incident in a pre-meditated fashion It should be remembered, that in Omagh the media contributed to the collapse of telephone communication, as noted in previous major incidents [19,21]. In this incident the GICU 404 was fully occupied making beds available and accepting the Figure 1

27 RGHT ED
Bremer R
Cook L
15. Rutherford WH
20. Daly DW
23. Weisaeth L
26. Hamilton J
31. Auf der Heide E
Findings
38. Morrissey JJ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.