Clinical relevance of shear wave elastography compared with transient elastography and other markers of liver fibrosis.

Abstract

BackgroundEarly and accurate non‐invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is important for reducing the burden of cirrhosis and related complications.AimThis cross‐sectional study compares shear wave elastography (SWE), transient elastography (TE) and clinical markers of chronic liver disease in patients with various liver disorders.MethodsLiver ultrasound with SWE was performed on 421 adult patients, 227 of whom also had TE. Patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), liver disease aetiology and laboratory results were recorded. Associations between SWE, TE and other tests for liver fibrosis and chronic liver disease severity were sought. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) equivalent to ≥F3 using Metavir staging.ResultsPatients were predominantly male (68%), with mean (standard deviation) age 54 (13) years, BMI 28 (6) kg/m2 and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 39 (27) U/L. Liver disorders were predominantly non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), chronic hepatitis B (CHB), chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and alcohol‐related liver disease. The median (interquartile range) LSM was 10 (6–20) kPa with SWE and 9.2 (6–21) kPa with TE. Advanced liver fibrosis was associated with older age, higher BMI, model for end‐stage liver disease score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AST/ALT ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis‐4 index and Hepascore. SWE and TE LSM were positively correlated, particularly for NAFLD and CHC. SWE LSM predicted ultrasound and endoscopy‐diagnosed portal hypertension and oesophageal varices.ConclusionsAcross various liver diseases, SWE is at least comparable with TE and other non‐invasive tests of liver fibrosis. SWE is accurate for predicting liver‐related portal hypertension.