Clinical Recommendations for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Data Assessment in Specific Patient Populations

Abstract

From an evidence-based perspective, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a well-supported assessment technique in both the United States (US) and Europe. The combination of standard exercise testing (ET) (ie, progressive exercise provocation in association with serial electrocardiograms [ECG], hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, and subjective symptoms) and measurement of ventilatory gas exchange amounts to a superior method to: 1) accurately quantify cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), 2) delineate the physiologic system(s) underlying exercise responses, which can be applied as a means to identify the exercise-limiting pathophysiologic mechanism(s) and/or performance differences, and 3) formulate function-based prognostic stratification. Cardiopulmonary ET certainly carries an additional cost as well as competency requirements and is not an essential component of evaluation in all patient populations. However, there are several conditions of confirmed, suspected, or unknown etiology where the data gained from this form of ET is highly valuable in terms of clinical decision making.1 Several CPX statements have been published by well-respected organizations in both the US and Europe.1–5 Despite these prominent reports and the plethora of pertinent medical literature which they feature, underutilization of CPX persists. This discrepancy is at least partly attributable to the fact that the currently available CPX consensus statements are inherently complex and fail to convey succinct, clinically centered strategies to utilize CPX indices effectively. Likewise, current CPX software packages generate an overwhelming abundance of data, which to most clinicians are incomprehensible and abstract. Ironically, in contrast to the protracted scientific statements and dense CPX data outputs, the list of CPX variables that have proven clinical application is concise and uncomplicated. Therefore, the goal of this writing group is to present an approach of CPX in a way that assists in making meaningful decisions regarding a patient’s care. Experts from the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation and American Heart Association have joined in this effort to distill easy-to-follow guidance on CPX interpretation based upon current scientific evidence. This document also provides a series of forms that are designed to highlight the utility of CPX in clinical decision-making. Not only will this improve patient management, it will also catalyze uniform and unambiguous data interpretation across laboratories on an international level. The primary target audience of this position paper is clinicians who have limited orientation with CPX but whose caregiving would be enhanced by familiarity and application of this assessment. The ultimate goal is to increase awareness of the value of CPX and to increase the number of healthcare professionals who are able to perform clinically meaningful CPX interpretation. Moreover, this document will hopefully lead to an increase in appropriate patient referrals to CPX with enhanced efficiencies in patient management. For more detailed information on CPX, including procedures for patient preparation, equipment calibration, and conducting the test, readers are encouraged to review other publications that address these and other topics in great detail.1–5