Abstract

There is a high incidence of mammary infections among females who attend the emergency department or surgery outpatient department. Acute bacterial mastitis either resolves under antibiotic therapy or evolves towards a pyogenic abscess. Traditional treatment of breast abscesses is by surgical incision, digital disruption of septa, evacuation of contents with occasional placement of surgical drains, and administration of systemic antibiotics. This strategy often requires general anaesthesia, may leave unpleasant scars, is more expensive than aspiration, requires regular postoperative dressing changes, and interferes with lactation. Overall, about 10–38% of abscesses recur and require additional surgical drainage. Needle aspiration of the pus in breast abscesses has been reported both with and without ultrasound guidance. It causes less scarring, does not affect breast-feeding, nor does it require general anaesthesia or hospitalization. It is in fact a less expensive procedure than surgery. This study was applied to all patients with mammary infections. Ultrasound-guided drainage was done for abscesses of limited size. If the abscesses were bigger or when image-guided aspiration was not effective, they were considered for operative intervention.

Highlights

  • Ultrasound-guided drainage has been described in smaller series as a treatment for breast abscesses, the treatment for which has traditionally been surgery or even less frequently, punctures without imaging guidance [1,2,3,4]

  • The standard treatment still remains early incision under general anaesthesia combined with drainage tube insertion [5]

  • The possibility of using sonographically-guided percutaneous aspiration has emerged as a valid alternative to surgical drainage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ultrasound-guided drainage has been described in smaller series as a treatment for breast abscesses, the treatment for which has traditionally been surgery or even less frequently, punctures without imaging guidance [1,2,3,4]. The standard treatment still remains early incision under general anaesthesia combined with drainage tube insertion [5]. Ultrasound-guided drainage causes less scarring, does not affect breast-feeding, nor does it require general anaesthesia or hospitalization [3]. It is a less expensive procedure than surgery [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.