Abstract

5572 Background: M-AEOC have been consistently associated with worse prognosis than the most common serous (S) histologic subtype; however it is unclear if this observation is related to more aggressive clinical presentation and/or chemoresistance behaviour. Methods: Data from four randomized phase III and one phase II AEOC first-line clinical trials were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Study selection criteria included: completed study, platinum-based chemotherapy and stage IIB to IV AEOC patients (pts). Results: Data on 1118 pts with advanced AEOC were analysed, of whom 94% were treated with paclitaxel-carboplatin-based CT. 786 pts had S-AEOC and 54 pts M-AEOC (5%). Peritoneal metastasis (mets) appeared more limited in M- than in S-AEOC pts since stages IIB-IIIB were more frequent (31% versus 19%, p = 0.001) and complete resection more frequently obtained (45% of stage II-III pts versus 29%, p = 0.06) in M-AEOC. Extra-peritoneal mets (stage IV) were more frequent in M- than in S-AEOC pts (30% versus 15%, p = 0.004), specially liver mets (44% of stage IV pts versus 23%, p = 0.06). Progressive disease during CT was observed in 40% of pts with stage IV M-AEOC. Progression free survival (PFS) was worse in M- than in S-AEOC pts both in stage IV (1y PFS: 15% versus 51%, p = 0.02) and in stage III with optimal resection (2y PFS: 42% versus 66%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to S-AEOC, M-AEOC is characterized by more limited peritoneal carcinomatosis but more frequent liver mets. M-AEOC appears to be a highly chemoresistant disease and complete resection of peritoneal mets is unable to reverse its adverse prognosis. New therapeutics options are needed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call