Abstract

Background and purpose: Given the great clinical heterogeneity of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, conventional classification only based on disease subtype or arrhythmia patterns may not adequately characterize this population. We aimed to identify different groups of AF patients who shared common clinical phenotypes using cluster analysis and evaluate the association between identified clusters and clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis in AF patients from AMADEUS and BOREALIS trials. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke/thromboembolism (TE), cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction, and/or all-cause death. Individual components of the primary outcome and major bleeding were also assessed. Results: We included 3980 AF patients treated with the Vitamin-K Antagonist from the AMADEUS and BOREALIS studies. The analysis identified four clusters in which patients varied significantly among clinical characteristics. Cluster 1 was characterized by patients with low rates of CV risk factors and comorbidities; Cluster 2 was characterized by patients with a high burden of CV risk factors; Cluster 3 consisted of patients with a high burden of CV comorbidities; Cluster 4 was characterized by the highest rates of non-CV comorbidities. After a mean follow-up of 365 (standard deviation 187) days, Cluster 4 had the highest cumulative risk of outcomes. Compared with Cluster 1, Cluster 4 was independently associated with an increased risk for the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70–3.46), all-cause death (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.58–3.49) and major bleeding (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.19–3.96). Conclusions: Cluster analysis identified four different clinically relevant phenotypes of AF patients that had unique clinical characteristics and different outcomes. Cluster analysis highlights the high degree of heterogeneity in patients with AF, suggesting the need for a phenotype-driven approach to comorbidities, which could provide a more holistic approach to management aimed to improve patients’ outcomes.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and despite substantial progress in its clinical management, it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality [1]

  • Conventional classification only based on disease subtype or arrhythmia patterns may not adequately characterize the atrial fibrillation (AF) patient population

  • Among the original 4169 AF patients treated with vitamin-k antagonists (VKA) from the merged dataset of the AMADEUS and BOREALIS studies, 3980 patients had complete baseline data for the 12 pre-specified clinical variables and were included in our study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and despite substantial progress in its clinical management, it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality [1]. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 843 cardiovascular (CV) risk factors which confer a great clinical variety to this condition, implying the need for a holistic approach to the patients [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] Given this heterogeneity, conventional classification only based on disease subtype or arrhythmia patterns may not adequately characterize the AF patient population. By using pooled individual patient data from two randomized, open-label AF trials (AMADEUS and BOREALIS) [20,21], we aimed to identify different groups of AF patients who shared common clinical phenotypes applying cluster analysis and to evaluate the association between identified clusters and trial-adjudicated clinical outcomes. Individual components of the primary outcome and major bleeding were assessed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call