Abstract

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory's SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets (Bacillus cereus group, Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets (Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: mecA, 97.2%; mecC, 100%; vanA, 96.8%; and vanB, 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle.

Highlights

  • Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories

  • The goal of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only (IUO) Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel compared to conventional methods for identification and antimicrobial resistance gene detection for common Gram-positive organisms recovered from positive blood cultures

  • Pan Gram-Negativeg Pan Candidah aBacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis. bBacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus atrophaeus, and Bacillus licheniformis. cIn the event that there is a species of Enterococcus, Listeria, Staphylococcus, or Streptococcus detected by the BCID-GP Panel, the genus-level target will always be detected along with the species that is identified (i.e., Staphylococcus epidermidis will appear on the ePlex BCID-GP Panel report as Staphylococcus spp. and Staphylococcus epidermidis). dLactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus zeae. eStreptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus. fAntimicrobial resistance genes will not be detected without a corresponding organism on the ePlex BCID-GP Panel

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. Several pathogen-specific assays, broader multiplex panel tests applying nucleic acid amplification and nonamplified array technologies, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) have been routinely incorporated into many laboratory workflows in the United States [11,12,13,14,15,16] Many of these assays are limited by the number of pathogens they can detect, and almost all of them have difficulty with differentiation of species in polymicrobial bacteremia [17,18,19]. The panels contain Pan Gram-Negative and Pan Candida probes for extended coverage outside of the Grampositive organisms The goal of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel compared to conventional methods for identification and antimicrobial resistance gene detection for common Gram-positive organisms recovered from positive blood cultures

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call