Clinical Outcomes, Return to Sports, and Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young and Middle-Aged Patients in an Asian Population—A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Abstract

To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young and middle-aged Asians. A retrospective study was performed using prospectively collected data from a tertiary institution ACL registry. All Asian patients with ACL tears who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between 2008 and 2014, with minimum 2-year follow-up, were included. Patients with previous knee surgery or multiligamentous knee injuries were excluded. Two groups were formed: young patients (YP) (age <30) and middle-aged patients (MP) (age >40). They were compared preoperatively and 6months, 1year, and 2years postoperatively for demographics, knee range of motion, anterior laxity, Tegner level, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee grade, ability to return to preinjury level of activity, and patient satisfaction. YP (n=84) and MP (n= 22) had differences in mean age (YP= 23.1years, range 18-29years; MP= 46.4years, range 41-59years, P < .001), preinjury Tegner level (YP= 7.4, MP= 6.4, P= .005), and preoperative Lysholm scores (YP=65.3, MP= 53.0, P= .034). The incidence of meniscal and chondral injuries was similar. Two years postoperatively, both groups had comparable knee range of motion and anterior laxity. The Tegner score was different (YP= 6.3, MP=5.2, P= .028), but the proportion of patients returning to preinjury Tegner level (YP= 45.2%, MP= 46.9%, P=.812), Lysholm scores (YP= 92.5, MP= 93.8, P= .794), proportion of patients with knees rated International Knee Documentation Committee A/B (YP= 77.4%, MP= 81.8%, P= .777), and satisfaction levels (YP= 98.5%, MP= 94.1%, P= .370) were similar. There were no graft ruptures or reoperations. In an Asian, predominantly male population, the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in YP and MP are equally good at 2-year follow-up. MP can benefit as much as younger patients from ACL reconstruction in terms of restoration of knee function and return to preinjury activity level, are equally satisfied with outcomes, and should not be excluded from surgery on the basis of age alone. Level III, retrospective comparative study.