Clinical outcomes of polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents vs stent grafts in peripheral arterial disease patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions

Abstract

ObjectiveZilver PTX polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents and Viabahn stent grafts are effective for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between the two devices in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in real-world settings. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective study concerned a clinical database of 445 patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford categories 1-6) who underwent either Zilver PTX or Viabahn implantation for a femoropopliteal lesion of 10 cm or longer with reference vessel diameters of 4.0 to 7.5 mm between 2012 and 2018 at five hospitals in Japan. Outcome measures were primary patency, freedom from stent thrombosis, freedom from any target lesion reintervention, limb salvage, and overall survival. After propensity score matching, these clinical outcomes were compared between patients treated with the Zilver PTX and those treated with the Viabahn. Also assessed were the interaction effects of baseline characteristics on the association of the Zilver PTX and Viabahn with restenosis and stent thrombosis. ResultsIn total, 271 patients were treated with the Zilver PTX, and 174 patients were treated with the Viabahn. Propensity score matching extracted 133 patient pairs with no major intergroup differences in baseline characteristics. The Zilver PTX group had a lower rate of 3-year primary patency (59.5%; [95% confidence interval (CI), 53.0%-66.2%] vs 69.6% [95% CI, 59.3%-79.4%]; P = .005), but a higher rate of 3-year freedom from stent thrombosis (93.6% [95% CI, 90.0%-96.3%] vs 82.4% [95% CI, 74.5%-89.0%], P = .038). There was no significant difference in overall survival, limb salvage, or freedom from reintervention (all P > .05). An interaction analysis showed that the restenosis risk of the Zilver PTX was significantly higher vs the Viabahn in patients with no or one below-the-knee runoff vessel and in those with intravascular ultrasound use than in patients with two or three below-the-knee runoff vessels and in those without intravascular ultrasound use, respectively (P for interaction = .046 and .010, respectively), whereas the stent thrombosis risk of the Zilver PTX was significantly smaller vs the Viabahn in patients not on dialysis than in those on dialysis (P for interaction = .034). ConclusionsCompared with Viabahn stent grafts, Zilver PTX stents have a lower rate of primary patency but a higher rate of freedom from stent thrombosis.