CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AFTER ORTHOTOPIC HEART TRANSPLANT

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Limited data are available on outcomes of patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who undergo orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) or develop de novo IBD post-OHT. We aimed to assess the incidence and disease outcomes of pre-existing and de novo IBD in OHT patients while evaluating the effect of IBD on OHT outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of records was performed from a tri-site tertiary care system between July 2000 and July 2022. A total of 83 OHT receipients were concomitantly diagnosed with colitis of infectious or inflammatory etiology. Only patients with a diagnosis of IBD were included. Sub-analyses of the outcomes and immunosuppressive regimens of OHT recepients were done relative to those with pre-existing or de novo IBD. RESULTS A total of 8 OHT patients with concomitant IBD were identified. The median patient age (IQR) was 54 (23) with OHT and IBD onset at 50 (21.2) and 32.5 (15.7), respectively. Six patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 2 were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease. Five of the patients were female. All patients developed IBD within 11.5 (8) years within OHT. Only 1 patient developed de novo IBD 15 years after the first OHT and 7 years prior to a second OHT. OHT immunosuppressive regimens included a combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and prednisone (n=2), TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=2), TAC, MMF, and sirolimus (n=2), TAC and sirolimus (n=1), and MMF with sirolimus (n=1). Therapy for pre-existing IBD included maintenance of 5-aminosalicylic (5-ASA) (n=3), escalation to vedolizumab (VD) (n=2), and discontinuation of IBD therapy (5-ASA and azathioprine) (n=3). De novo IBD consistent with UC (15 years post-OHT) was managed with 5-ASA (n=1). Six patients (including de novo IBD case) maintained clinical and endoscopic remission of IBD with no flares post-OHT while 2 patients (1 UC and 1 CD) with active disease flares responded clinically and endoscopically to VD escalation from 5-ASA and azathioprine. Among two UC patients with ileal J-pouch pre-OHT, 1 developed refractory pouchitis requiring diverting ileostomy (while on TAC and prednisone) with no pouchitis in the other (maintained on TAC and MMF). Good graft tolerance limited to mild acute cellular rejection episodes was noted in 6 patients, while multiple or no rejection episodes were noted in the remaining two. None of the patients developed CMV or MMF-induced colitis. One patient died due to progressive functional decline unrelated to graft failure or IBD. DISCUSSION The clinical course and treatment of IBD preceding OHT or de novo (though rare) is not significantly worsened or altered post-OHT. The majority of patients achieve clinical and endoscopic remission while on heart transplant-related immunosuppression. Biologic therapy escalation to VD resulted in clinical remission with no effect on graft tolerance. Table 1 Clinical outcomes of OHT patients with concomitant IBD