Abstract

Background and aims EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has been used for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) with promising clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of EUS-GE for GOO. Material and methods We used the keyword ‘EUS-guided gastroenterostomy’ to search in Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane databases. Clinical outcomes of EUS-GE were evaluated in terms of technical success, clinical success and complications. Results Ten studies reported 297 patients managed with EUS-GE. Weighted pooled rates (WPR) for technical success, clinical success and complications of EUS-GE were 91% (95%CI 87%-94%), 88% (95%CI 83%–91%) and 6.8% (95%CI 4.1%–11.0%). The most common complications were abdominal pain, 6.7% (95%CI 2.5%–16.5%) and bleeding, 4.8% (95%CI 1.5%–13.9%). Two studies compared EUS-GE with surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Pooled risk ratio (RR) for technical success, clinical success and complications were 0.87 (0.78, 0.97), I 2 = 0%; 0.92 (0.82, 1.04), I 2 = 0%; 0.28 (0.11, 0.68), I 2 = 0%. Three studies compared benign GOO with malignant GOO. RR for technical success and clinical success were 1.05 (0.82, 1.34), I 2 = 0%; 0.98 (0.72, 1.33), I 2 = 0%. Conclusions Although EUS-GE and SGJ had similar clinical success rates, EUS-GE had a lower complication rate. EUS-GE is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive choice for patients with GOO.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.