Abstract
Background: Pirfenidone, an antifibrotic medication approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), often requires dose reduction owing to adverse events. In this study, we evaluated if pirfenidone's reduced dose has any impact on clinical outcomes in patients with IPF. Methods: We used the data of a prospective post-marketing study of pirfenidone conducted at 10 hospitals in South Korea from 2014 to 2017. Dose reduction was defined when the pirfenidone dose was temporarily or permanently reduced to manage adverse events or when the treatment dose failed to reach the standard dose. Study patients were classified based on the most frequently administered dose during 48-week follow-up-1800mg, 1,200mg, and <1,200mg/days. The following clinical outcomes were compared between the groups: death, hospitalization, acute exacerbation, pulmonary function decline, and changes in severity of dyspnea and cough. Results: The median follow-up duration in all 143 patients was 11months. During the study period, 70.6% experienced at least one dose reduction. Patients treated with standard-dose pirfenidone tended to be young and had the lowest diffusing capacity. Pulmonary function changes did not differ depending on the pirfenidone dose. The three groups were not significantly different in terms of the proportion of death, hospitalization, and acute exacerbation. The symptom changes were also similar between the groups. Conclusion: Reduced doses did not negatively impact clinical outcomes compared with the standard-dose pirfenidone in patients with IPF. Dose reduction may be a useful method to manage adverse events while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.