Clinical outcomes in patients receiving oral anticoagulation stratified by the presence of dose reduction criteria and older age: a subanalysis of ENVISAGE-TAVI AF

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction In the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (Edoxaban vs Standard of Care and Their Effects on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Having Undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation–Atrial Fibrillation) trial, edoxaban (EDX) was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for preventing most adverse clinical events but was associated with increased major bleeding (MB). Presence of EDX dose reduction criteria applied in the trial (DRC; body weight ≤60 kg, CrCL 15–50 mL/min, concomitant use of selected P-glycoprotein-inhibitors) indicates a more vulnerable patient phenotype. Purpose Compare clinical outcomes after TAVI for AF patients with and without DRC stratified by anticoagulation strategy and age. Methods ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (NCT02943785) was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial comparing EDX vs VKA in patients with AF as the indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) after successful TAVI. In this analysis, outcomes—which included net adverse clinical events (NACE; composite all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, systemic thromboembolic event, valve thrombosis, or MB), intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, non-CV death, MB bleeding, fatal MB bleeding, and major gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB) —were compared in patients with vs without DRC, further stratified by OAC use, and age (< or ≥80 years [y]). Results Patients meeting DRC (n=637) were older, more often female, and had lower baseline CrCL than those without (n=740). In addition, these patients had significantly higher rates of NACE (P=0.0375) and all-cause death (P=0.0136). There were no differences in MB or MGIB rates between patients with vs without DRC. EDX resulted in more MB (hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.6 [1.1–2.5] and MGIB (2.6 [1.2–5.8]) than VKA only in patients without DRC. In patients aged <80 y meeting DRC, rates of all-cause death (P=0.0366) and CV death (P=0.0042) were significantly higher than those without DRC. Among patients aged <80 y, there were no differences in rates of clinical outcomes between EDX and VKA regardless of the presence or absence of DRC; Figure 1). In patients aged ≥80 y, there were no differences in rates of all-cause death, MB, or MGIB in those with or without DRC; Figure 2). Additionally in this age group, there was no difference in MB between patients on EDX and VKA both with and without DRC. However, there was more MGIB with EDX when there were no DRC. In patients aged ≥80 y with DRC, all-cause death was lower with EDX. Conclusions In this subanalysis of ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, the presence of DRC indicates a more vulnerable patient phenotype at higher risk for all-cause death after TAVI and in whom a lower EDX dose may have substantial benefits in terms of outcomes, including bleeding events, particularly in patients ≥80 y.Figure 1Figure 2