Abstract

Background: A simple classification for the relevance of lesions (P0, P1, and P2; no bleeding potential, less likely to bleed, and more likely to bleed, respectively) based on capsule endoscopy (CE) findings has been used. This study aimed at investigating rebleeding rates and predictive factors of P0 and P1 lesions after obtaining negative findings in both, CE and computed tomography (CT), for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Methods: Among 193 patients resulted in negative CE findings defined as P0 or P1 lesions, 84 patients with negative results on CT images were enrolled in this study. The rebleeding rates and predictive factors were assessed in the P0 and P1 groups. Results: Overall rebleeding rate in patients with negative CT and CE was 17.9%; 18.4% in the P0 group; 17.4% in the P1 group within a median follow-up duration of 18.5 months. In the P0 and P1 groups, the cumulative rebleeding rates were 9.2%, 25.4%, and 25.4%, and 6.9%, 11.8%, and 18.6% at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively (p = 0.97). There were no independent rebleeding associated factors in the P0 group, whereas Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.019, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.158–3.519, p = 0.013), and initial low hemoglobin (Hb) level (<8 g/dL) (HR = 15.085, 95% CI: 1.182–192.514, p = 0.037) were independent predictive factors responsible for rebleeding in the P1 group. Conclusions: Despite having negative findings on CT and CE, patients with OGIB have a significant potential rebleeding risk. Although there was no significant difference in rebleeding rates between the P0 and P1 groups on CE, the P1 group, with CCI or low initial Hb level, should be cautiously observed after the first bleeding episode.

Highlights

  • Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) represents approximately 5–10% of all gastrointestinal bleedings [1,2]

  • This study was initiated based on two hypotheses; a significantly potential rebleeding risk observed even in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) patients with negative computed tomography (CT)

  • This is the first study to analyze clinical outcomes according to P0 and P1 lesions in patients with OGIB with negative CT and capsule endoscopy (CE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) represents approximately 5–10% of all gastrointestinal bleedings [1,2]. In most guidelines of OGIB, capsule endoscopy (CE) is considered as the first-line modality [1,3,4,5]. According to Korean guidelines, contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) as well as CE are considered as first-line modalities [4]. Japanese guidelines recommend contrast-enhanced CT as the first-line diagnostic modality for OGIB since initiation [8]. A simple classification for the relevance of lesions (P0, P1, and P2; no bleeding potential, less likely to bleed, and more likely to bleed, respectively) based on capsule endoscopy (CE). P0 and P1 lesions after obtaining negative findings in both, CE and computed tomography (CT), for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call