Abstract
Aims: To review pregnancy outcomes, complication rates and neonatal neural development of selective termination procedures for complicated monochorionic (MC) twins. Methods: This was a retrospective review of the pregnancies that underwent selective reduction with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) in our institution. Results: Forty-eight cases underwent selective reduction with BCC and the remaining 45 with RFA. Overall survival was not statistically different between the RFA and BCC groups (71.1 and 62.5%, p = 0.379). With regard to the indications, the survival rates were not significantly different for twin to twin transfusion syndrome, twin reversed arterial perfusion, discordant anomalies and selective intrauterine growth restriction. Preterm premature rupture of membrane was not statistically different between the BCC and RFA groups (47.9 and 33.3%, p = 0.153). Five foetuses presented with abnormal middle cerebral artery-peak systolic velocity in the BCC group and 4 in the RFA group (p = 0.829). In the BCC group, neurological injury was detected in 2 neonates, presenting with cerebral dysplasia on MR scanning. In the RFA group, intracranial haemorrhage Grade III was detected in one neonate with cranial ultrasound (p = 0.607). Conclusions: Overall survival and complication rates following selective reduction in complicated MC twin pregnancies is similar irrespective of whether the reduction was performed using RFA or BCC. Key Message: It seems that selective reduction in MC pregnancies with RFA does not carry a significant decrease in the overall survival and complication rates than the cases with BCC. According to our data, neurodevelopmental impairment of the co-twins is relatively seldom after selective reduction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.