Clinical outcome of the delineation-without-negative-biopsy strategy in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy for identifying the extent of differentiated-type early gastric cancer.

Abstract

The histologic evaluation of biopsy samples collected from the surrounding mucosa has conventionally been used to determine the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer. Recently, optical delineation using magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has been considered an alternative method to histologic evaluation. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and efficacy of this method in identifying cancer margins. Overall, 921 patients with 1018 differentiated-type early gastric tumors who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were examined. Before ESD, the lesions were classified based on whether they have clear or unclear margins on magnifying IEE. When the lesions had clear margins, the marking dots were placed outside the margins without a negative biopsy. Successful delineation was defined as lesions with clear margins and accurate delineation based on histopathological examination. The primary outcome was the accuracy of optical delineation without a negative biopsy compared with histopathological diagnosis. Moreover, the clinicopathological factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were assessed. Of 1018 lesions, 820 had a clear margin and 198 an unclear margin. Of 820 lesions with a clear margin, 817 and 3 had an accurate and inaccurate delineation, respectively, according to the histological examination. Accordingly, the accuracy rate of optical delineation was 99.6% (817/820). The significant independent factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were absence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication, tumor size > 20mm, and moderate differentiation. Optical delineation may be an alternative method to histological evaluation in lesions with a clear margin on magnifying IEE.