Clinical outcome of the 2nd generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation — A sub-study of the randomized trial evaluating single versus dual cryoballoon applications

Abstract

AimsTo assess the efficacy of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF), and to compare it to patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). MethodsThe outcome (arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months) was prospectively assessed in patients with PersAF(n = 77) and compared to that in patients with PAF(n = 62), who underwent PVI within a randomized trial evaluating single versus dual applications with the 2nd generation cryoballoon. Other endpoints included symptoms of AF, quality of life, procedure related characteristics, redo ablation rates and adverse events. Variables predicting recurrences were studied including all patients. ResultsFreedom from arrhythmia recurrence was 64.9% after a single ablation and 68.8% after one or more procedures, which was significantly lower compared to PAF patients; 82.2% (p = 0.029) and 83.9% (p = 0.048) respectively, at 12 months. The improvements in EHRA score (−1.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001), symptom severity score (SSQ) (−5.0 ± 4.2, p < 0.0001) and EQ5D-5 L global score (+10.4 ± 20.3, p = 0.0002) after ablation was significant compared to baseline. The re-ablation rate was 7/77 (9.1%) which did not differ from that in PAF patients, 9/62 (14.5%), p = 0.42. Procedure duration, 104.8 ± 37.4 versus 113 ± 31.2 min (p = 0.129), application time, 1605 ± 659 versus 1521 ± 557 s (p = 0.103) and total adverse events after 12 months, 8/77 (10.4%) versus 5/62 (8.1%) (p = 0.77) did not differ in PersAF versus PAF patients. ConclusionBoth symptoms and QoL improved significantly in patients with PersAF after ablation. Freedom from AF was clinically significant but lower than in PAF patients. The cryoballoon seems an effective technique also in patients with persistent AF.