Abstract

Extreme long-term clinical outcome studies following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with an autologous iliac crest with and without Caspar plating (ACDF+CP) for the treatment of radiculopathy caused by cervical disc herniation (CDH) are extremely rare. Hospital records of patients who underwent ACDF or ACDF+CP for the treatment of CDH at least 17years ago were reviewed. Information about diagnosis, surgery, pre- and postoperative clinical process, and repeated procedure was analyzed. At final follow-up, patients were reviewed with a standardized questionnaire including the current neurological status, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Odom's criteria, a modified EQ-5D, and limitations in quality of life. One hundred twenty-two patients with a mean follow-up of 25years were evaluated. ACDF was performed in 80 and ACDF+CP in 42 patients, respectively. At final follow-up, 81.1% of patients were free of radicular pain and had no repeated procedure. According to Odom's criteria, 86.1% of good to excellent functional recovery was noted. The mean NDI and EQ-5D was 14% and 5 points, respectively. There was no significant difference in the assessed clinical outcome parameters between patients treated with ACDF and ACDF+CP. The rate for repeated procedure due to degenerative cervical disorders was 10.7 and 7.4% due to symptomatic adjacent segment disease with 25years. ACDF and ACDF+CP achieved a high rate radicular pain relief (89.3%) and clinical success (86.1%) for the treatment of CDH within a 25years follow-up. No statistical difference concerning clinical outcome and rate of repeated procedure was detected.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.