Abstract

Neurophysiology is part of a Neurologist9s armamentarium. There are instances, however, when nerve conduction studies and electromyography does not represent the patient9s clinical features and may, in turn, lead us away from the correct diagnosis. We present a rare case of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability, which was initially diagnosed as motor neuron disease based on neurophysiological findings. This had repercussions for the patient9s prognosis and management of his initial symptoms. The patient was a 70 year old gentleman who presented with weakness, fasciculations, weight loss and difficulty in breathing. On further questioning he also had insomnia, hyperhidrosis, dysaesthetic pain in both legs and pruritis affecting his feet. His fasciculations were global including his face. He had diminished reflexes which improved with repetitive exercise. CT thorax revealed a thymoma and his sera was positive for AChR antibodies, negative for MUSK, VGCC and VGKC antibodies. Incidentally the patient was treated for an exacerbation of COPD with steroids which improved his symptoms, including fasciculations, confirming an antibody mediated phenomenon. The final diagnosis is therefore more in keeping with a paraneoplastic Morvan9s syndrome secondary to thymoma and not Motor Neuron disease.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call