Clinical impact of weekly paclitaxel plus cetuximab is comparable to the EXTREME regimen for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Abstract

Until the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the EXTREME regimen comprising platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab was the standard of care for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Recent reports suggest the usefulness of regimens including taxanes in combination with cetuximab as treatment options for R/M HNSCC patients with contraindications for platinum. However, comparisons of weekly paclitaxel plus cetuximab (wPTX-Cmab) to the EXTREME regimen are limited. We compared the clinical impact of wPTX-Cmab to EXTREME as first line treatment for R/M HNSCC in Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). From 2012 to 2018, 77 patients, including 55 treated with EXTREME and 22 refractory or intolerant to platinum treated with wPTX-Cmab, were analyzed. wPTX-Cmab was comparable to EXTREME on OS [adjusted HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.39-1.48)], PFS [adjusted HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.49-1.65)], ORR [wPTX-Cmab 34.7% (12-43), EXTREME 30.9% (18-43), p = 0.877] and DCR [wPTX-Cmab 72.7% (52-92), EXTREME 65.4% (52-78), p = 0.337]. Survival trends remained similar after stratification by platinum-refractory or intolerance status. Disease control with wPTX-Cmab was significantly associated with better OS [adjusted HR 0.18 (0.05-0.57)]. wPTX-Cmab may be a suitable treatment option for R/M HNSCC patients with contraindications for platinum.