Clinical impact of the changes of muscle volume during various systemic therapies in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract

e16177 Background: Sarcopenia is associated with clinical outcomes in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical impact of muscle volume during systemic therapy is unknown. We investigated the changes in muscle volume during various systemic therapies for HCC. Methods: The patients with unresectable HCC (u-HCC) treated with a molecular targeted agent as initial systemic therapy were included. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated from the skeletal muscle area at the L3 level of the lumbar vertebrae using computed tomography. Sarcopenia was defined as an L3 SMI value≦42 cm2/m2 for men and 38 cm2/m2 for women. ΔSMI was defined as the difference between baseline and 6-14 weeks after the administration of the agent. Results: A total of 174 patients was analyzed. The 1st-line agent was sorafenib (SOR) (n = 89), lenvatinib (LEN)(n = 58), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATE+BEV) (n = 27). In three groups, ATE+BEV group had significantly fewer discontinuation due to adverse events. (ATE+BEV 6 cases, LEN 31 cases, SOR 32 cases, p = 0.014). The median PFS was 4.1, 3.0, and 6.1 months in SOR, LEN, and ATE+BEV. The median Δ In patients treated with ATE+BEV, pretreatment sarcopenia was not associated with OS and PFS, while the patients with a SMI decrease (at 6-14W, n = 12) had significantly shorter PFS than the patients without a SMI decrease (n = 15) (p = 0.026). The best radiological response based on RECIST ver1.1 in ATE+BEV was CR (n = 2), PR(n = 6), SD(n = 15), and PD (n = 3). The patients without a SMI decrease tended to have better disease control rate than patients with a SMI decrease (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.08). There were no significant differences in age, etiology, ALBI score, BCLC stage, and pretreatment AFP between the patients with and without a SMI decrease. The significant factor associated with PFS after the administration of ATE+BEV as 1st-line was a decrease of SMI (HR9.44, 95% CI 1.04-85.6, p = 0.046). In patients treated with SOR and LEN, pretreatment sarcopenia and SMI decrease were not significantly associated with OS and PFS. Conclusions: The decrease of muscle volume at 6-14W was significantly associated with PFS in patients treated with ATE+BEV, while pretreatment sarcopenia was not a significant factor. Monitoring muscle volume during immunotherapy would be useful in clinical practice.