Clinical impact of developing better practices at the institutional level on surgical outcomes after distal pancreatectomy in 1515 patients: Domestic audit of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.

Abstract

Background and AimInstitutional standardization in the perioperative management of distal pancreatectomy (DP) has not been evaluated in a multicenter setting. The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of institutional standardization on the development of postoperative complications after DP.MethodsData were collected from 1515 patients who underwent DP in 2006, 2010, and 2014 at 53 institutions in Japan. A standardized institution (SI) was defined as one that implemented ≥6 of 11 quality initiatives according to departmental policy. There were 541 patients in the SI group and 974 in the non‐SI group. Clinical parameters were compared between groups. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality were assessed by logistic regression analysis with a mixed‐effects model.ResultsProportion of patients who underwent DP in SI increased from 16.5% in 2006 to 46.4% in 2014. The SI group experienced an improved process of care and a lower frequency of severe complications vs the non‐SI group (grade III/IV Clavien‐Dindo; 22% vs 29%, respectively, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula; 22% vs 31%, respectively, P < .05 for both). Duration of in‐hospital stay in the SI group was significantly shorter than that in the non‐SI group (16 [5‐183] vs 20 postoperative days [5‐204], respectively; P = .002). Multivariate analysis with a mixed‐effects model showed that soft pancreas, late drain removal, excess blood loss and long surgical time were risk factors for post‐DP complications (P < .05). Pancreatic texture, drain management and surgical factors, but not standardization of care, were associated with a lower incidence of post‐DP complications.