Abstract

New technologies for mutation detection in the human genome have greatly increased our understanding of epilepsy genetics. Application of genomic technologies in the clinical setting allows for more efficient genetic diagnosis in some patients; therefore, it is important to understand the types of tests available and the types of mutations that can be detected. Making a genetic diagnosis improves overall patient care by enhancing prognosis and recurrence risk counseling and informing treatment decisions.

Highlights

  • New technologies for mutation detection in the human genome have greatly increased our understanding of epilepsy genetics

  • The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has revolutionized the field of medical genetics and gene discovery across many different disciplines

  • Keeping up with the barrage of novel genetic findings is a significant challenge for investigators and clinicians alike, as is determining which clinical test is most appropriate to order for any given patient

Read more

Summary

In Epilepsy Genetics

New technologies for mutation detection in the human genome have greatly increased our understanding of epilepsy genetics. Application of genomic technologies in the clinical setting allows for more efficient genetic diagnosis in some patients; it is important to understand the types of tests available and the types of mutations that can be detected. Exome studies in large patient cohorts confirm that de novo mutations are important in epileptic encephalopathies beyond Dravet syndrome and that there is significant genetic heterogeneity. EGI and similar collaborative efforts will be essential to moving the field forward even more quickly For both gene panels and exomes (and even for single gene tests), availability of family DNA may be important for interpreting results. In individuals with “epilepsy-plus”—that is, epilepsy plus any other feature, including developmental delay or intellectual disability, congenital anomaly, autism spectrum disorder, and so on—consider CMA testing to detect CNVs first This would include patients with nonspecific epileptic encephalopathy. There are many considerations when deciding which to select, including phenotype (is a specific panel available?), severity (is a rapid diagnosis required for medical decision-making?), and cost

Key Points
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.