Clinical features of patients with ankylosing spondylitis with inefficacy of two or more biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs

Abstract

The “Treat-to-target” (T2T) strategy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has made it possible to optimize therapy in most patients, but in some of them the treatment goals are not achieved.Objective: to analyze the clinical features of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with inefficacy of two or more biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).Material and methods. From February 2020 to March 2022 458 patients with AS, who met the modified New York criteria of 1984, were admitted to V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology. From this group, 30 (6.6%) patients with high clinical disease activity and inefficacy of at least two bDMARDs were selected. The control group consisted of 139 (30.5%) patients with AS, who either had no history of bDMARDs use, or had previously received only one of them. All patients were examined in accordance with generally accepted methods and underwent a double expert control.Results and discussion. Men predominated in the main and control groups (67 and 60%, respectively). In patients of the main group, there was a higher laboratory activity of the disease, especially ESR (p=0.002), more often peripheral arthritis was detected. In both groups, there was a high incidence of coxitis (69.2 and 69.7%, respectively), while in the main group there were significantly more patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty, and the frequency of detected syndesmophytes was 2 times lower compared to the control. Differences in the features of AS onset were also established: in the main group, the disease often began with reactive arthritis (ReA), while in the control group, with inflammatory back pain.Conclusion. The T2T strategy in axSpA does not always lead to the achievement of the intended goals, and, according to our data, among inpatients with AS, the number of people with a history of inefficacy of two or more bDMARDs reaches 6%. In these patients, compared with the control, the following features of the disease can be distinguished: frequent onset with ReA, a significant incidence of peripheral arthritis and joint arthroplasty, and a higher ESR.