Abstract

Objective: To analyze the differences of clinical characteristics and outcomes between relapsing and monophasic patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis. Methods: Medical records of confirmed anti-LGI1 encephalitic patients who underwent immunotherapy were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to January 2019 in the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University. Clinical data, treatment methods, duration of treatment and outcomes were analyzed between the relapsing and monophasic groups. Results: Among the 33 anti-LGI1 encephalitic patients, there were 12 and 21 cases in the relapsing and monophasic groups, respectively. No difference was found in age, sex, precipitating factors, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, symptoms and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in the acute phase (P>0.05). As to the lab test and image examination, no statistic difference was found in serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) positive rate, hyponatremia, abnormal rate of electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), CSF and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesion locations (P>0.05). No difference was found in time to diagnose the disease between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The median immunotherapy period was 102.5 days in relapsing group and 194.0 days in monophasic group, with a statistic difference (P=0.001). No patients had bad outcomes in the monophasic group at the last follow-up, while 6 patients had poor outcomes in the relapsing group (4 patients died). The patients in relapsing group had a worse prognosis compared to those in the monophasic group (P=0.007). Conclusions: Relapse is common in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Patients in the relapsing group received a shorter term of immunotherapy and had worse outcomes than those in the monophasic group.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call