Clinical factors associated with need for neurosurgical care in young children with imaging for macrocephaly: a case control study

Abstract

BackgroundMacrocephaly is present in 2.3% of children with important neurosurgical conditions in the differential diagnosis. The objective of this study was to identify clinical associations with actionable imaging findings among children with head imaging for macrocephaly.MethodsWe conducted a case-control study of head imaging studies ordered for macrocephaly among children 24 months and younger in a multistate children’s health system. Four neurosurgeons reviewed the images, determining cases to be a ‘concern’ if neurosurgical follow-up or intervention was indicated. Electronic health records were reviewed to collect patient-level data and to determine if surgery was performed. Controls were matched 3:1 to cases of ‘concern’ in a multivariate model using conditional logistic regression.ResultsIn the study sample (n = 1293), 46 (4%) were concern cases, with 15 (1%) requiring surgery. Significant clinical factors associated with neurosurgical concern were bulging fontanel [aOR 7.47, (95% CI: 2.28–24.44), P < 0.001], prematurity [aOR 21.26, (95% CI: 3.76–120.21), P < 0.001], any delay [aOR 2.67, (95% CI: 1.13–6.27), P = 0.03], and head-weight Z-score difference (W_diff, defined as the difference between the Z-scores of head circumference and weight) [aOR 1.70, (95% CI: 1.22–2.37), P = 0.002].ConclusionsHead imaging for macrocephaly identified few patients with findings of concern and fewer requiring surgery. A greater head-weight Z-score difference appears to represent a novel risk factor for neurosurgical follow-up or intervention.