Clinical experience with non-penetrating vascular clips in free-flap reconstructions

Abstract

To date, the gold standard for performing a microvascular anastomosis has been the penetrating suture with attached needle. During the last two decades, non-penetrating techniques have been introduced, including the Unilink system for end-to-end anastomoses, and the VCS clip-applier system for both end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses. The aim of this study was to compare the results of different techniques used to create microvascular anastomoses in free-flap reconstructions. Between January 1995 and October 1999, we performed 474 microvascular anastomoses in 216 consecutive free-tissue transfers. The anastomosis techniques included manual sutures (42%), Unilink rings (34%) and VCS clips (24%). Seven combined sutured-clipped anastomoses were excluded from further analysis. The mean anastomotic time when rings were applied was significantly shorter than when using clips (P 0.0001) or sutures (P 0.0001). Venous anastomoses using clips took less time than those using sutures (P 0.05). There were 19 anastomotic failures, all of which lead to early flap failure. Ten flaps were salvaged by early reoperation; nine flaps were lost. Three more flaps were lost as a result of other causes, bringing the flap survival rate down to 94.4%. Early flap failure was caused by failure of the arterial anastomosis in eight cases; all of them were sutured (these represented 5% of all arterial anastomoses with sutures). None of the clipped arterial anastomoses failed. Early flap failure was caused by failure of the venous anastomosis in 11 patients. Three of these anastomoses were sutured (representing 6% of all venous anastomoses with sutures), seven were anastomosed with rings (representing 5% of all venous anastomoses with rings) and one was clipped (representing 2% of all venous anastomoses with clips). Both the VCS clip-applier system and the Unilink system are easy to handle and allow fast microvascular anastomoses without intraluminal penetration. The patency rate of clipped vessels is at least as good as the patency rates of vessels anastomosed using sutures or rings.