Clinical evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of cysteamine 5% cream in comparison with tranexamic acid mesotherapy in subjects with melasma: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial study.

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of Tranexamic Acid (TA) mesotherapy versus cysteamine 5% cream in the treatment of melasma. This single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted among 54 subjects between 2018 and 2019. Cysteamine 5% cream group was instructed to apply the cream on the melasma lesions 30min before bed for 4 consecutive months. Conversely, 0.05mL (4mg/mL) TA mesotherapy was performed by a physician every 4weeks until 2months. The severity of melasma was evaluated using both Dermacatch® device and the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI). The most remarkable improvement rate was observed in the TA group at the third visit based on mMASI and Dermacatch® values at 47% and 15% in turn. The mMASI scores were substantially improved in both groups at the second visit (cysteamine vs TA 8.48 ± 2.34 and 7.03 ± 3.19; P = 0.359) and third visit (cysteamine vs TA 6.32 ± 2.11 and 5.52 ± 2.55; P = 0.952) as compared to baseline (cysteamine vs TA: 11.68 ± 2.70 and 10.43 ± 2.69). Dermacatch® values were significantly declined at the second and third visits (cysteamine vs TA 42.54 ± 12.84 and 38.75 ± 9.80, P = 0.365; 40.74 ± 12.61 and 36.17 ± 10.3, P = 0.123, respectively) compared with baseline (cysteamine vs TA 45.76 ± 13.41 and 42.41 ± 10.48), although the improvement rates between two groups were not significantly different. Findings suggest that none of the cysteamine and TA mesotherapy treatments measured by both mMASI and Dermacatch® methods have substantial advantages over the other; however, complications are less in the cysteamine than the TA mesotherapy group.