Abstract

Purpose: To assess image quality and uncertainty in organ-at-risk segmentation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) enhanced by deep-learning convolutional neural network (DCNN) for head and neck cancer. Methods: An in-house DCNN was trained using forty post-operative head and neck cancer patients with their planning CT and first-fraction CBCT images. Additional fifteen patients with repeat simulation CT (rCT) and CBCT scan taken on the same day (oCBCT) were used for validation and clinical utility assessment. Enhanced CBCT (eCBCT) images were generated from the oCBCT using the in-house DCNN. Quantitative imaging quality improvement was evaluated using HU accuracy, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Organs-at-risk (OARs) were delineated on o/eCBCT and compared with manual structures on the same day rCT. Contour accuracy was assessed using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and center of mass (COM) displacement. Qualitative assessment of users’ confidence in manual segmenting OARs was performed on both eCBCT and oCBCT by visual scoring. Results: eCBCT organs-at-risk had significant improvement on mean pixel values, SNR (p < 0.05), and SSIM (p < 0.05) compared to oCBCT images. Mean DSC of eCBCT-to-rCT (0.83 ± 0.06) was higher than oCBCT-to-rCT (0.70 ± 0.13). Improvement was observed for mean HD of eCBCT-to-rCT (0.42 ± 0.13 cm) vs. oCBCT-to-rCT (0.72 ± 0.25 cm). Mean COM was less for eCBCT-to-rCT (0.28 ± 0.19 cm) comparing to oCBCT-to-rCT (0.44 ± 0.22 cm). Visual scores showed OAR segmentation was more accessible on eCBCT than oCBCT images. Conclusion: DCNN improved fast-scan low-dose CBCT in terms of the HU accuracy, image contrast, and OAR delineation accuracy, presenting potential of eCBCT for adaptive radiotherapy.

Highlights

  • Head and neck cancer (HNC) is reported as the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (Parkin et al, 2005)

  • Seven region of interests (ROIs) were segmented on repeat simulation CT (rCT) and the mean pixel values were calculated for each ROI on rCT, original CBCT (oCBCT), and Enhanced CBCT (eCBCT) images

  • When compared with rCT, the mean difference in CT values of ROIm between rCT and oCBCT were 90 HU, while the difference between rCT and eCBCT reduced to 50 HU

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is reported as the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (Parkin et al, 2005). Anatomic changes due to tumor response or weight loss may lead to under- or over-dosage to target volumes or overdosage to organs at risk (OARs) during radiotherapy. Changes in the plan dosimetry may result in increased risk of toxicity and/or impact tumor control (Chen et al, 2014; Castelli et al, 2015). ART requires re-segmentation of OARs and treatment target volumes on each re-planning CT image. This process, if performed manually, is time-consuming with high intra- and inter-observer segmentation variability (Brouwer et al, 2012; Nelms et al, 2012; Lim and Leech, 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call