Abstract

BackgroundTranscutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children.AimThe aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy).MethodsPart I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12 years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24 h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response.DiscussionWe hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876. Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020.

Highlights

  • Background and rationale {6a} The reported prevalence of daytime lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD) in children ranges widely from 1 to 20% [1]

  • We hypothesize that Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a non-inferior treatment for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) in children compared to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy

  • Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a} The reported prevalence of daytime lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD) in children ranges widely from 1 to 20% [1]. Without daytime LUTD, is considered as a separate entity and has an estimated prevalence of 5–10% at the age of seven [1]. In the management of both OAB and nocturnal enuresis, the objective is to increase the bladder capacity if reduced for the age. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. Few randomized shamcontrolled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call