Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in postoperative complications and prognosis between patients treated with neuroendoscopy versus conventional craniotomy surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 107 patients with HICH were included. Among them, 58 underwent neuroendoscopy (Group A), while 49 underwent conventional craniotomy under microscopic guidance (Group B). Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) was applied in both groups. The clinical data, incidence of postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative intracranial pressure values, and rate of favorable prognosis were compared between the two groups. ResultsNo significant difference in baseline clinical data upon admission was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative intracranial pressure did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the postoperative intracranial pressure in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P < 0.05). After intervention with the different surgical approaches, Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and a significantly higher rate of favorable prognosis compared with Group B (P < 0.05). ConclusionNeuroendoscopy combined with ICPM is a safe and reliable approach for the treatment of HICH that reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and improves the recovery of neurological function after surgery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.