Clinical efficacy of HBOT(hyperbaric oxygen therapy) in the treatment of foot ulcers in elderly diabetic patient: our experience

Abstract

Background The development of foot ulcers is a serious complication in elderly diabetic patients. Its treatment is based on the use of different techniques, but when they fail that often lead to limb amputation. The efficacy of treatment with HBOT in diabetic foot ulcer has been evaluated for more than 20 years, but its use has never become routine, its use is a reality that in recent years is increasingly consolidating, especially as an adjuvant to conventional therapies and the NPWT (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ) and dermal substitutes. Many studies prove its validity, experimentally the beneficial effects consist in the improvement of tissue perfusion, inflammatory cytokines down-regulation, fibroblasts proliferation, edema reduction , angiogenesis promotion and collagen production, it is also proven by the years the favorable effect against infectious component of the lesion [1,2]. In particular, the hyperbaric oxygen increases the bactericidal activity and is particularly toxic to anaerobes [3]. In addition, many studies, including some meta-analyzes, documenting the positive role of HBOT in reducing the risk of amputation, although a recent meta-analysis it is clear the shortterm benefit, but for the long-term studies would be needed to be so designated such as to minimize any bias [4]5. In our center, we evaluated the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to reduce limb amputation risk. Methods This observational study, open-label short-term evaluated the clinical efficacy of this method integrated medical therapy, treatment of wound cleansing and debridement, and topical applications of hydrocolloids, alginates, polyacrylates and foams. After obtaining informed consents, 7 diabetic patients with foot ulcers (n = 7) were enrolled and treated with cycles of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (2.4 ATA) for a period of about 85 minutes for 5 days a week, during the period between January and September 2012, with follow-up until May 2013.Among the exclusion criteria we considered: patients with compromised bone and / or Charcot’s foot, Wagner class greater than III, non elegible patients for HBOT (AP chest X-ray, visit ENT, cardiological examination with ECG, laboratory tests to assess feasibility), then patients with severe impairment of arterial district in the affected arm. All patients have done foot X-ray and ECO Color Doppler of lower limb as preliminary study, which showed: four patients Wagner class II, Winsor index between 0.9 and 1, three patients Wagner Class III, with winsor pathological index. The treatment was carried out in two stages: at first, the patients were treated with medical therapy, surgical debridement, exudate management and stimulation of granulation and epithelialization with advanced wound dressings, wound swabs and orthotics , in a second time were matched HBOT cycles. The follow-up was done by clinical and biochemical controls with particular attention to the glycemic profile and obtaining optimal levels of glycated hemoglobin, and taking cilostazol tablets 100 mg, possibly associated with antiplatelets (cardioaspirin, clopidogrel). We established two outcome measures : 1) surgical healing of the lesions, 2) amputation (short-term assessment by the end of treatment until May 2013). * Correspondence: luciano.grimaldi@unina.it Department of Specialized Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Rehabilitation of Election and Emergency. “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Grimaldi et al. BMC Surgery 2013, 13(Suppl 1):A26 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/13/S1/A26