Clinical Efficacy of Current Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Retrospective Evaluation: Basic and clinical research on this technology shows that the system development process needs serious review and revision

Abstract

In spite of intensive research on transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDSs), only four--nitroglycerin, clonidine, estradiol, and scopolamine--have reached the market, and the clinical effectiveness of these systems has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Ideally, a candidate for transdermal drug delivery should demonstrate clinical significance within a wide therapeutic range for a well-documented indication for use. Continuous administration of a drug should result in better control of the disease with fewer side effects and a marked increase in patient compliance than when traditional dosage forms are used. It appears that nitroglycerin is a poor candidate for transdermal drug delivery by virtue of the ambiguity associated with its clinical pharmacology, substantial interpatient variation in dose-response relationship, and development of tolerance with potential toxicity risks in chronic administration. Clonidine's well-defined indication for use coupled with its high potency and low molecular weight with high lipid solubility is well suited to transdermal therapy. Because estradiol is unsuitable for use in people who smoke and has dermatotoxic potential, it is a marginal candidate for use in TDDSs. Transdermal scopolamine was not reviewed because it is a unique entity (no conventional dosage forms of this product are available) intended for short-term use. Its use is dictated more by the patient's unique circumstances, such as travel requirements, than by physiological condition. Although TDDSs provide a convenient and effective means of administering medications, the aforementioned clinical constraints need to be evaluated in depth before more widespread application of TDDSs can be recommended. In particular; conclusive demonstration of biocompatibility of a TDDS is warranted.