Abstract

Radical surgery after cervical conization is a common approach for the treatment of cervical cancer. In some cases, disease progression is observed after positive margins at conization, but the effect of conization on disease progression remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of positive margins at conization in cervical cancer. A total of 101 patients who underwent cervical conization before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were considered eligible by reviewing medical records. The association between the positive margins and patient outcomes, including subsequent lymph node metastasis, was evaluated. The rate of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) positivity at radical surgery was significantly higher in patients with positive margins (p = 0.017) than in those with negative margins, although there was no significant difference in the rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis (p = 0.155). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the overall survival or progression-free survival between the two groups (p = 0.332 and 0.200, respectively). A positive margin at conization presented no significant prognostic disadvantage; thus, diagnostic conization is one of the most suitable treatment options for early-stage cervical cancer that is difficult to accurately assess.

Highlights

  • Patients who underwent radical surgery including pelvic lymph node dissection for cervical cancer from January 2010 to May 2020 (n = 443)

  • According to the Japanese and the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, diagnostic conization is an important method for determining the exact stage of cancer and most accurate treatment strategy for patients with cervical c­ ancer[8,14,15]

  • As depicted by the results of this study, there is a potential risk of cutting a tumor in some cases, resulting in a positive margin at conization

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of positive margins at conization in cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of cervical conization with positive margins; the rate of positive lymph nodes, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated as endpoints

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call