Abstract
BackgroundWeil’s osteotomy (WO) is the most applied surgical treatment for metatarsalgia, a persistent pain in the lesser metatarsals’ heads. We aim to review its effectiveness and safety compared to the percutaneous technique known as distal metatarsal mini-invasive osteotomy (DMMO). MethodsSystematic review in Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl and Cochrane Library. We included studies that directly compared WO and DMMO for the treatment of primary metatarsalgia. Data on pain, function, complications and patients’ satisfaction were extracted and narratively synthesized. ResultsFour retrospective studies were identified. There were no significant differences in clinical effectiveness or patients’ satisfaction. Time to bone healing was significantly longer for DMMO, whereas WO showed more wound problems and metatarsophalangeal stiffness. Other complications were infrequent in the two procedures. ConclusionEvidence on the direct comparison of WO and DMMO is scarce and of low quality. Randomized studies are needed in order to control for potential confounders.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
