Abstract
Clinical decision science, a newly identified area of scholarship, describes how clinical research is used for a patient, within the context of their unique social conditions. We hypothesize that physicians use sociocultural context as an important input to their decision making. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind mixed methods study. Family medicine faculty and residents at a community hospital family medicine residency were included in the study. After academic journal club discussing a primary research paper, physicians were asked if they would prescribe medication for a patient who was similar to the subjects in a research paper. However, social and cultural context was given to the cases. The physicians were block randomized into two groups; Group A was given a case with a patient who had a social and cultural context more conducive to lifestyle modification, while group B had a case more conducive to prescribing medication. Primary outcome was whether or not physicians prescribed medication, allowing for a 2x2 table for analysis. We also asked a free response question regarding the reasoning for their decision and performed qualitative analysis. In group A (n=14), no subjects prescribed medication. In group B (n=18), six subjects prescribed medication. (chi-square statistic with Yates correction 9.95, p=0.001). Thematic analysis in group A showed 22 statements related to medical practice or disease characteristics, and 25 statements related to familial relationships and patient preferences. In group B, subjects who prescribed medication made 30 statements related to medical practice, and 13 statements related to patient preference. Subjects who did not prescribe medication made 10 statements related to medical practice, and 1 statement related to patient preference. This study demonstrates social context of individual patients, together with evidence, affects clinical decision and management. We propose further study into how this affects physician decision making, a scholarly field we call Clinical Decision Science.
Highlights
Despite the inherent complexity of clinical decision making, the process by which clinicians make decisions has only been studied on a sociologic level
This study demonstrates social context of individual patients, together with evidence, affects clinical decision and management
We propose further study into how this affects physician decision making, a scholarly field we call Clinical Decision Science
Summary
Despite the inherent complexity of clinical decision making, the process by which clinicians make decisions has only been studied on a sociologic level. Doctors excel in the biological domain and have some skills in the psychological domain, the role that a patient’s social context plays in clinical practice has largely been ignored. Clinical Research in Practice: Journal of Team Hippocrates has published reports within this domain, which it has labeled clinical decision science.[9] Clinical decision science is “a holistic examination of how clinical decisions are made. This includes both biomedical and medical social sciences, in addition to other ways of understanding human experience.”[10]. Our hypothesis was that physicians’ prescribing behavior is influenced by social context of the patient
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
