Abstract
Clinical decision-making within occupational therapy is a complex and dynamic process shaped by numerous scientific, narrative, professional, ethical, legal and personal factors. By reflecting on these factors and by developing metacognition of one's own reasoning pathways, biases, and heuristics, patient-centred and balanced clinical decisions can be made. This reflective case study examines the factors underpinning an occupational therapist's clinical decision making for a man with terminal cancer. A critical reflective model is used in this article to provide structure and to ensure critical consideration of the case. Implications for practice aim to serve as inspiration for others to reflect on their own journey, and personal action points are detailed to develop the author's own clinical decision-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
