Abstract
In Reply. —The letter by Drs Zenilman, Rompalo, and Jadack highlights several important issues that were discussed in our Clinical Crossroads article. Zenilman and colleagues raise the issue of a physician's to potential victims of future harm, a duty enshrined in the Tarasoff case. 1 The problem with respect to the patient under discussion is that to warn potential victims, the clinician must know their identities. In this case, we cannot predict who the patient's future sexual partners will be. Short of successful treatment, the clinician cannot protect or warn society at large, except by incarcerating the patient or perhaps forcing him to wear a warning label. Such measures have not been adopted by American society. Indeed, American society has, by and large, limited the paternalistic powers that physicians have. Only in limited circumstances, such as the mentally ill individual who poses an immediate risk to self or
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.