Abstract

Objective To examine the surgical and nonsurgical visual outcomes of young subjects with idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes (ERMs). Design Retrospective observational and noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Nineteen consecutive subjects (20 eyes) aged 40 years or less with an idiopathic macular ERM. Methods Group 1: 10 consecutive eyes were initially seen with visual acuity of 20/50 or better; 7 eyes were observed, and 3 eyes with progressive visual loss to <20/50 underwent vitrectomy and membrane peeling. Group 2: 10 consecutive eyes with presenting visual acuity of 20/60 or worse underwent vitrectomy and membrane peeling. Main outcome measures Visual acuity, cataract formation, ERM recurrence, operative complications. Results Group 1: With no surgery, visual acuity remained stable or improved in 5 of 10 eyes (50%), with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Three of 10 eyes (30%) had visual loss ≤20/60 develop and underwent vitrectomy. Postoperative visual acuity improved an average of 6 lines with a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. Group 2: After vitrectomy, visual acuity improved 2 or more lines in 7 of 10 eyes (70%), with a mean improvement of 4.4 lines and mean follow-up of 29.2 months. Groups 1 and 2: Three of 13 eyes (23%) that underwent vitrectomy had recurrent ERM formation. Conclusions Young subjects with idiopathic macular ERMs and a presenting visual acuity of 20/50 or better had a favorable visual outcome with observation. Subjects with an initial vision of 20/60 or worse, or those who had a visual decrease to ≤20/60 had significantly improved visual acuity after vitrectomy. ERM recurrence is relatively high after surgery.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.