Clinical comparison of single-shot EPI, readout-segmented EPI and TGSE-BLADE for diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebellopontine angle tumors on 3 tesla

Abstract

ObjectiveThe complex anatomical structures of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) pose a unique challenge to diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). This study aimed to compare the clinical utility of the prototypic 2D turbo gradient- and spin echo-BLADE-DWI (TGSE-BLADE-DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI (RESOLVE-DWI) and single-shot echo-planar DWI (SS-EPI-DWI) to visualize CPA anatomic structures and identify CPA tumors. MethodsA total of 8 volunteers and 36 patients with pathological CPA tumors were enrolled to perform the three DWI sequences at 3 T. Scan time of TGSE-BLADE-DWI, RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI was 5 min 51 s, 5 min 15 s and 1 min 22 s, respectively. Subjective analysis, including visualization of anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality of the three DWI sequences were scored and assessed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of CPA tumors were measured and compared. ResultsA total of 39 lesions were identified, TGSE-BLADE-DWI detected all of them, RESOLVE-DWI 36 and SS-EPI-DWI 27. Significant differences were found in all the subjective parameters among the three DWI sequences (all p < 0.001). TGSE-BLADE-DWI was significantly better than RESOLVE-DWI in visualization of CPA anatomical structures, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality (all p < 0.01), and RESOLVE-DWI showed significantly superior performance than SS-EPI-DWI in all parameters (all p < 0.001). CNRs and ADCs were not significantly different among the three DWI sequences (p = 0.355, p = 0.590, respectively). No significant differences were detected between TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and RESOLVE-DWI SNR (p = 0.058), or TGSE-BLADE-DWI SNR and SS-EPI-DWI SNR (p = 0.155). ConclusionCompared with RESOLVE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI, TGSE-BLADE-DWI minimized geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts and demonstrated an improved ability for depicting CPA tumors with better lesion conspicuity. SummaryGeometric distortions and ghosting artifacts are found at bone-air interfaces using conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is a challenge for imaging cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. Our study validated that geometric distortions and ghosting artifacts were not present on 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo-BLADE-DWI scans, making this technique useful for visualizing CPA anatomic structures and diagnosing CPA tumors.