Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to Clinical Comparative evaluation of the maxillary 1st molars distalization by the Bone-Anchored Distalizer and the Traditional Tooth-Supported Distalizer. Patients and Methods: The sample was consisted of 20 patients (7 males and 13 females), 7 patients (3 Males and 4 females) for group A and 13 patients (4 males and 9 females) for group B. However, 2 of them discontinued the treatment due to different causes. As a result of this, the study was performed on 18 patients. The sample was selected from patients seeking orthodontic treatment in out- patient clinic, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al- Azhar University, Assiut , Egypt. Patients was divided into two groups; Group (A): In this group, upper molar distalization was done with bone anchored distalizer (advanced molar distalization appliance AMDA, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) and Group (B): In this group, upper molar distalization was done with tooth supported distalizer (fast back appliance, leone, s.p.a, italy).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
