Abstract
Limited data exists regarding patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support who require long- term inotropes. The primary objective was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality of LVAD recipients with prolonged inotrope use (PIU), particularly those requiring outpatient inotropic therapy. Secondary endpoints were to compare preimplant characteristics and predictors of PIU, mortality, time to gastrointestinal bleed, infection and arrhythmias. Retrospective cohort study on all adult patients with primary continuous flow LVADs implanted during January 2008 to February 2017 and follow-up through February 2018. We defined PIU as ≥14 days of inotrope support and compared to those who required <14 days. Kaplan-Meier method, competing risk models and Cox-proportional hazard models were used and summarized with hazard ratios (HR). Analytic sample was 203 patients, 58% required PIU and 10% were discharged on inotropes. We found no statistical difference in pre-implant characteristics. One-year survival rate was 87% if no PIU required and 74% if PIU required. Those discharged on inotropes had 72% 1-year survival. PIU was associated with longer length of stay and higher cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. We found no association between PIU and late re-initiation of inotropes, infection or arrhythmias. In multivariable analysis the hazard risk of death was increased in patients with PIU (HR=1.66, p=0.046), older age (HR=1.28, p=0.031) and higher creatinine levels (HR=1.60, p=0.007). Prolonged inotrope use is frequently encountered following LVAD implantation and associated with adverse prognosis but remains a therapeutic option.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.