Abstract
To analyze clinical characteristics and cost-effectiveness of different final surgical options for treating patients with open tibial fractures. A retrospective analysis was conducted by enrolling 55 surgically treated patients with open tibial fractures from January 2018 to June 2019. All the patients were categorized in intramedullary nailing (IMN) group and locking compression plate(LCP) group according to the final fixation option. There were 35 cases in group IMN including 27 males and 8 females, aged from 25 to 69 years old with an average of (49.0±10.6) years old. Based on Gustilo-Anderson classification, there were 1 case of typeⅠ, 19 cases of typeⅡand 15 cases of type Ⅲ. There were 20 cases in group LCP including 15 males and 5 females, aged from 46 to 72 years old with an average age of (53.4±14.7) years old. Based on Gustilo-Anderson classification, there were 2 cases of typeⅠ, 11 cases of typeⅡand 7 cases of type Ⅲ. Preoperative waiting time, surgical debridement times, intraoperative bleeding loss, blood and albumin transfusion, operation time, bacterial cultures and complications, bone union time, Johner-Wruhs criteria at 1 year after operation and total cost within 1 year after surgery between two groups were compared. The variables recorded between two groups were statistically analyzed and compared respectively, then the factors affecting hospital costs were evaluated by univariate and multiple linear regression analysis respectively, finally the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Total 55 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up time of(16.4±7.1) months ranged from 14 to 27 months postoperatively. There were no significantly statistical differences of the demographic materials between the two groups. The intraoperative bleeding loss were(243.18±118.82) ml and (467.86±490.53) ml respectively in group IMN and LCP, the significantly statistical difference was discovered(P<0.05). The surgical duration were(247.50±57.94) min and(350.00±178.77) min respectively in group IMN and LCP, the significantly statistical difference was discovered(P<0.05). There were no significantly statistical differences of the average days before operation, surgical debridement times, received blood and albumin transfusion, wound cultures, complications and bone union time between the two groups(P>0.05). The univariate analysis of the factors affecting the hospital costs indicated that patients with smoke or alcohol (P=0.042), high energy damage (P=0.012), patients with comorbidity diseases(P=0.045), surgical debridement over 2 times (P=0.001), intraoperative bleeding loss over 400 ml (P<0.001), blood and albumin transfusion (P=0.027), wound cultures (P=0.000) and complications (P=0.035) were the factors. The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated the smoke or alcohol using[β=-0.256, t=-2.628, 95%CI(-29 667.09, -4 997.47), P=0.014] was the only factor affecting the total cost. The excellent and good rate were 80% and 85% respectively based on the Johner-Wruhs criteria. The average total cost within 1 year after surgery was (136 435.90±39 093.98) CNY in group IMN and (140 034.62±56 821.12) CNY in group LCP. The total surgical duration and total intraoperative bleeding loss were significant lower in group IMN than in group LCP. The average total costs of was significantly higher. The average cost for every 1% of excellent and good rate was 1 705.45 CNY in group IMN and 1 647.46 CNY in group LCP. Each 1% increasing of excellent and good rate cost 719.74 CNY more in group LCP compared with group IMN. Both IMN and LCP could provide a satisfactory outcome for open tibial fractures. Meanwhile considering the total cost, patients with smoke or alcohol history, traffic accident, comorbidity diseases, surgical debridement over 2 times, intraoperative bleeding loss over 400 ml, and complications should not be ignored.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.