Abstract

Objective : To assess the long-term clinical benefit of elective stenting as compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in small coronary arteries. Design : The Stenting in Small Coronary Arteries (SISCA) trial was a randomized trial comparing elective stenting with PTCA in coronary arteries with a reference diameter of 2.1-3.0 mm. The heparin-coated beStent was used. Control angiography was performed after 6 months, and the patients were followed clinically for 12 months. Results : At 6 months the clinical outcome was significantly better in the stent group as compared with the PTCA group, with an event-free survival in 90.5 and 76.1% ( p = 0.016), respectively. From 6 to 12 months, event-free survival was unchanged in both groups, demonstrating a sustained long-term clinical benefit of elective stenting. Conclusion : Angioplasty in small coronary arteries is associated with a favorable clinical outcome after 1 year. The clinical benefit of elective stenting using the Hepamed ® -coated beStent is maintained beyond 6 months, without any tendency towards late events. Thus, elective stenting should be considered as an option when treating small coronary arteries.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call